Arsenic bioaccessibility in contaminated soils: Coupling in vitro assays with sequential and HNO3 extraction.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Arsenic bioaccessibility varies with in vitro methods and soils. Four assays including unified BARGE method (UBM), Solubility Bioaccessibility Research Consortium method (SBRC), in vitro gastrointestinal method (IVG), and physiologically based extraction test (PBET), were used to determine As bioaccessibility in 11 contaminated soils (22-4,172 mg kg(-1)). The objective was to understand how bioaccessible As by different methods was related to different As pools based on sequential extraction and 0.43 M HNO3 extraction. Arsenic bioaccessibility was 7.6-25, 2.3-49, 7.3-44, and 1.3-38% in gastric phase (GP), and 5.7-53, 0.46-33, 2.3-42, and 0.86-43% in intestinal phase (IP) for UBM, SBRC, IVG, and PBET, respectively, with HNO3-extractable As being 0.90-60%. Based on sequential extraction, As was primarily associated with amorphous (AF3; 17-79%) and crystallized Fe/Al oxides (CF4; 6.4-73%) while non-specifically sorbed (NS1), specifically sorbed (SS2), and residual fractions (RS5) were 0-10%, 3.4-20% and 3.2-25%. Significant correlation was found between As bioaccessibility by PBET and NS1+SS2 (R(2) = 0.55-0.69), and UBM-GP and NS1 + SS2 + AF3 (R(2) = 0.58), indicating PBET mostly targeted As in NS1+SS2 whereas UBM in NS1 + SS2 + AF3. HNO3-extractable As was correlated to bioaccessible As by four methods (R(2) = 0.42-0.72) with SBRC-GP having the best correlation. The fact that different methods targeted different As fractions in soils suggested the importance of validation by animal test. Our data suggested that HNO3 may have potential to determine bioaccessible As in soils.
منابع مشابه
In vitro bioaccessibility and in vivo relative bioavailability in 12 contaminated soils: Method comparison and method development.
Previous studies have established in vivo-in vitro correlations (IVIVC) between arsenic (As) relative bioavailability (RBA) and bioaccessibility in contaminated soils. However, their ability to predict As-RBA in soils outside the models is unclear. In this study, As bioaccessibility and As-RBA in 12 As-contaminated soils (22.2-4172 mg kg(-1) As) were measured using five assays (SBRC, IVG, DIN, ...
متن کاملComparison of arsenic bioaccessibility in housedust and contaminated soils based on four in vitro assays.
Few studies have assessed As bioaccessibility in housedust using different in vitro assays and compared to those in contaminated soils. We determined As bioaccessibility in 24 housedust samples (4.48-38.2 mg kg(-1)) using SBRC, IVG, DIN, and PBET assays and they averaged 73, 68, 53, and 48% in the gastric phase and 26, 46, 55 and 43% in the intestinal phase of the 4 assays. The corresponding As...
متن کاملLead bioaccessibility in 12 contaminated soils from China: Correlation to lead relative bioavailability and lead in different fractions.
This study investigated the relationship between Pb relative bioavailability (RBA) and bioaccessibility, and their relationships with Pb in different pools in soils. Twelve Pb-contaminated soils representing different contamination sources from China were analyzed for Pb bioaccessibility using four in vitro methods (UBM, SBRC, IVG, and PBET), Pb-RBA using a mouse blood model, and Pb fractionati...
متن کاملUsing nitrogen and carbon dioxide molecules to probe arsenic(V) bioaccessibility in soils.
Highly specialized personnel and high cost are typically required for in vivo risk assessment of arsenic (As) exposure to humans in As-contaminated soils. Arsenic bioaccessibility in soils, as determined with the aid of in vitro tests, is quite variable, and its magnitude depends upon unidentified soil properties. Use of soil chemical properties is a common practice for construction of As(V) so...
متن کاملRelative Bioavailability and Bioaccessibility and Speciation of Arsenic in Contaminated Soils
BACKGROUND Assessment of soil arsenic (As) bioavailability may profoundly affect the extent of remediation required at contaminated sites by improving human exposure estimates. Because small adjustments in soil As bioavailability estimates can significantly alter risk assessments and remediation goals, convenient, rapid, reliable, and inexpensive tools are needed to determine soil As bioavailab...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of hazardous materials
دوره 295 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015